November 3, 2026
What Australian employees want in 2027, and who’s being left behind
Employee engagement in Australia has climbed to 73%, but the recovery isn’t reaching everyone. Our 2026 data shows who’s being left behind, and what…

May 2025
This article will see me examine these new work practices, using over 40 years of business experience, including my time as Managing Director at Waitrose and now as Founder of WorkL to determine if they are worth it- for both employer and employees.
The last five years have seen the workplace evolve at an incredible rate, one of which many of us haven’t seen in our working lives. The traditional nine-to-five, five-day week is increasingly being challenged. A surge in radical workplace practices, four-day workweeks, remote flexibility, and no-meeting Fridays, promises to improve employee wellbeing and reduce stress. But how much of this is significant change, and how much is simply a well-branded distraction?
This article will see me examine these new work practices, using over 40 years of business experience, including my time as Managing Director at Waitrose and now as Founder of WorkL to determine if they are worth it- for both employer and employee.
At WorkL, we’ve spent years analysing what makes employees happy and fulfilled at work. Our data from over 1 million employees across multiple sectors shows that flexibility is indeed one of the key drivers of workplace satisfaction. But to truly understand whether these modern practices reduce stress, we must look beyond surface-level perks and examine the deeper fabric of how people work.
The idea of a four-day workweek is nothing short of revolutionary in concept. Reducing the working week without reducing pay sounds like a dream, and trials in the UK and abroad have shown some promising results. Organisations report maintained or even increased productivity, and employees report feeling happier and more energised.
However, the success of the four-day week hinges on one critical factor; realistic workload management. If staff are expected to squeeze five days of work into four, the risk of burnout can actually increase rather than diminish. What’s needed is a fundamental re-evaluation of work priorities, not just fewer hours, but better clarity around what work is truly essential.
Our data at WorkL shows that stress levels only decrease when workload expectations are adjusted to match the new time constraints. Simply chopping a day off the calendar without strategic planning can create a Wellbeing Risk. Done right, however, the four-day week can genuinely improve work-life balance and employee morale.
The rise of remote and hybrid work has, for many, been the single most positive shift in recent memory. The ability to avoid long commutes, work in comfortable environments, and manage one’s own schedule can be incredibly empowering. Our data shows that employees who have autonomy over where they work report significantly higher levels of happiness and lower levels of stress- all through Empowerment- one of my Six Steps to Workplace Happiness outlined below.
However, flexibility is not a solution. It requires trust, communication, and robust support systems. Employees working remotely can feel isolated or overlooked if managers aren’t proactive. Equally, some workers find it difficult to switch off, blurring the line between work and personal time.
In this context, flexibility must be paired with clear boundaries. Employers need to set expectations around availability, response times, and meeting etiquette. Managers must learn to lead by outcomes rather than hours. When done well, flexible working is a powerful stress-reducer. When poorly managed, it can exacerbate stress in new and unexpected ways.
The trend of “No-Meeting Fridays” is an appealing one. In theory, it provides uninterrupted time for deep work and allows employees to round off the week without the chaos of back-to-back calls. It’s a gesture that acknowledges how meetings, often excessive, redundant, or poorly run, can be a major source of frustration.
The effectiveness of this policy depends entirely on culture. If Friday becomes a dumping ground for catch-up emails and last-minute fire drills, then the benefit is quickly lost. But if respected and embedded into the rhythm of the business, it can give employees a crucial window of peace, a buffer to organise thoughts, close open loops, and finish the week on a high.
The short answer is – they can. But only when implemented thoughtfully and authentically.
At WorkL, we believe the key to reducing stress and boosting happiness lies in holistic engagement. That means giving people purpose, recognition, development opportunities, and crucially, a say in how they work. Flexible arrangements, shorter weeks, and smart scheduling all support this goal, but they are tools, not solutions in themselves.
It’s time we move beyond one-size-fits-all perks and start focusing on personalised workplace experiences. I encourage employers to use my Six Steps to Workplace Happiness listed below, as a guidance to creating a happy workforce.
This article originally featured in Elite Business Magazine.
November 3, 2026
Employee engagement in Australia has climbed to 73%, but the recovery isn’t reaching everyone. Our 2026 data shows who’s being left behind, and what…
October 26, 2026
The human cost of growth and why India’s workplace wellbeing is at a crossroads As AI adoption accelerates and global standards reshape employee expectations,…
October 15, 2026
In the latest edition of WorkLife Business News, we explore how leading organisations leverage purposeful rewards, manager-led recognition, and active listening to drive workplace…